Health Law

Specializations

  • Acted in the leading cases of Steep v. Kingston General Hospital and Hospital for Sick Children v. Leone, in which the court recognized the importance of quality assurance principles applying to documentation generated in the course of quality assurance initiatives at hospitals.
  • Advised on province-wide information technology initiatives involving more than 100 hospitals with regards to critical care, emergency department, surgical efficiency, and eMPI, WTIS and PACS services.
  • Manages patent portfolios for therapeutic and nutritional technologies generated at a major research-based Toronto hospital. We work with the hospital’s technology transfer officers to assess patentability, draft and file patent applications and assess freedom-to-operate based on competing technologies.
  • Acted pro bono for an intervener (the Schizophrenia Society of Canada), in its intervention before the Supreme Court of Canada in Starson v. Swayze case, which considered the legal test for capacity to consent to treatment in psychiatric care under Ontario’s Health Care Consent Act. The Court accepted our unique submissions as to the requisite burden of proof on health practitioners, thereby clarifying an important principle of law in a direction favourable to healthcare providers and families.
  • Acted as counsel for the successful hospital in the leading Canadian case defining the relationship between the public hospital and an independent practitioner with privileges — Yepremian v. Scarborough General Hospital, (1980) 110 D.L.R. (3rd) 513 (Ont. C.A.).
  • Advised on responding to adverse events and unexpected outcomes, including investigations and disclosure to patients, residents or family members.
  • Represented the Ontario Hospital Association at the Daniel/Dupont Inquest (Windsor, Ontario) and helped ensure a systemic hospital management perspective was brought to the inquest.
  • Provided project advice to health care facilities, and project lenders in respect of the financing of major capital projects; an example is The Hospital for Sick Kids Research and Learning Tower.
  • Lakeridge Health Corporation and OPSEU (Koscik Arbitration). Labour arbitration before Arbitrator Carrier. Decision issued March 12, 2012. We successfully represented Lakeridge Health Corporation in upholding the discharge of an employee for time theft
  • Regularly advise retirement communities and long-term care facilities on the following matters, among others: statutory compliance accreditation regulations and guidelines complaints process and mandatory reporting obligations acts that can only be performed by certain categories of health care professionals (“controlled acts”) health and safety risks issues pertaining to leases / tenancies privacy issues such as access to a resident’s file by family members advertising and promotions
  • Acted in the leading cases of Steep v. Kingston General Hospital and Hospital for Sick Children v. Leone, in which the court recognized the importance of quality assurance principles applying to documentation generated in the course of quality assurance initiatives at hospitals.
  • Advised on province-wide information technology initiatives involving more than 100 hospitals with regards to critical care, emergency department, surgical efficiency, and eMPI, WTIS and PACS services.
  • Manages patent portfolios for therapeutic and nutritional technologies generated at a major research-based Toronto hospital. We work with the hospital’s technology transfer officers to assess patentability, draft and file patent applications and assess freedom-to-operate based on competing technologies.
  • Acted pro bono for an intervener (the Schizophrenia Society of Canada), in its intervention before the Supreme Court of Canada in Starson v. Swayze case, which considered the legal test for capacity to consent to treatment in psychiatric care under Ontario’s Health Care Consent Act. The Court accepted our unique submissions as to the requisite burden of proof on health practitioners, thereby clarifying an important principle of law in a direction favourable to healthcare providers and families.
  • Acted as counsel for the successful hospital in the leading Canadian case defining the relationship between the public hospital and an independent practitioner with privileges — Yepremian v. Scarborough General Hospital, (1980) 110 D.L.R. (3rd) 513 (Ont. C.A.).
  • Advised on responding to adverse events and unexpected outcomes, including investigations and disclosure to patients, residents or family members.
  • Represented the Ontario Hospital Association at the Daniel/Dupont Inquest (Windsor, Ontario) and helped ensure a systemic hospital management perspective was brought to the inquest.
  • Provided project advice to health care facilities, and project lenders in respect of the financing of major capital projects; an example is The Hospital for Sick Kids Research and Learning Tower.
  • Lakeridge Health Corporation and OPSEU (Koscik Arbitration). Labour arbitration before Arbitrator Carrier. Decision issued March 12, 2012. We successfully represented Lakeridge Health Corporation in upholding the discharge of an employee for time theft
  • Regularly advise retirement communities and long-term care facilities on the following matters, among others: statutory compliance accreditation regulations and guidelines complaints process and mandatory reporting obligations acts that can only be performed by certain categories of health care professionals (“controlled acts”) health and safety risks issues pertaining to leases / tenancies privacy issues such as access to a resident’s file by family members advertising and promotions

Testimonials

Chambers Canada 2019

“Leading practice with unparalleled bench strength that is renowned for its ability to provide high-quality legal advice and representation across the entire health sector.”

Chambers Canada 2019

“Proven skill across a broad array of healthcare matters including privacy and IT, governance, medical malpractice litigation and corporate transactions.”

Chambers Canada 2019

Clients describe their experience with the firm as "excellent," highlighting that "they're very responsive" and "always very open about strategies to take on litigation files."

Key Contacts

View All Professionals

Insights

View All Insights
View All Insights

Stay Up to Date

Subscribe to receive our insights and perspectives on the latest legal developments that will affect you.
Register